Miami Premises Liability Lawyer | The Perazzo Law Firm

In Florida, being hurt on someone else’s property is not the same as having a case — you have to prove the property owner knew about the hazard, or should have. For a slip and fall on a spilled or tracked-in substance inside a business, Fla. Stat. § 768.0755 puts that burden squarely on you: the business must have had actual or constructive knowledge of the dangerous condition and should have taken action to fix it. That single sentence decides most Miami premises cases, and the proof that satisfies it — surveillance video, sweep and inspection logs, incident reports — sits on the property owner’s own servers and is routinely overwritten within days. A Miami premises liability lawyer for Slip and Fall Accidents at The Perazzo Law Firm can move to preserve it. Call 888-PERAZZO for a free case evaluation.

Miami-Dade runs on other people’s property. Grocery aisles and open-air plazas, condo towers and garages, hotel lobbies and pool decks, apartment complexes and construction sites. When something on that property injures you, the owner’s insurer has one job — to make the fall your fault. This page explains exactly what Florida law makes you prove, what evidence proves it, and what the defense will do with the parts you cannot prove.

Attorney advertising. General information about Florida law, not legal advice. No result is promised or guaranteed.

The Statute That Decides Most Miami Slip and Fall Cases: Fla. Stat. § 768.0755

Florida law does not make a business the insurer of everyone who walks in. Since 2010, Fla. Stat. § 768.0755 has governed one specific and extremely common scenario: a person slips and falls on a transitory foreign substance in a business establishment. A “transitory foreign substance” is anything that does not belong on the floor and was not there permanently — water, produce, grease, a spilled drink, tracked-in rain, a dropped item.

In that scenario the statute requires the injured person to prove the business had actual or constructive knowledge of the dangerous condition and should have taken action to remedy it. Proving you fell, proving you were hurt, and proving the floor was wet are not enough. You must connect the hazard to the business’s knowledge of it. That is where these cases are won and lost.

Actual knowledge — someone who worked there knew

Actual knowledge means an employee, manager, or agent of the business was aware of the condition before you fell. A customer reported the spill. An employee walked past it. A manager radioed for a mop. Someone placed a cone and then removed it too early. This is the cleanest path to liability and the rarest one, because it usually depends on testimony or a recording the business controls.

Constructive knowledge, path one — the condition existed long enough

Section 768.0755 allows constructive knowledge to be proven by circumstantial evidence showing that the dangerous condition existed for such a length of time that, in the exercise of ordinary care, the business establishment should have known of the condition. This is a time argument, and time has to be shown with something. Timestamped video is the strongest proof. So is the physical character of the substance itself: dirt, cart tracks, dried edges, footprints through a spill, melted or separated liquid. A puddle that has been walked through by six people is a different fact than a puddle that appeared thirty seconds ago.

Constructive knowledge, path two — the condition occurred with regularity

The statute’s second path is that the condition occurred with regularity and was therefore foreseeable. This does not depend on how long your particular spill sat there. It depends on the pattern. A leaking cooler or freezer case. A drink station that overflows every day. An entryway that floods every afternoon in a Miami rainy season, where the business knows exactly what happens and still puts out nothing. Proving regularity means proving history — prior incident reports, prior complaints, maintenance and repair records, and employee testimony about “the usual” spot.

The evidence that actually proves each prong — and how fast it disappears

Evidence	What it tends to prove	Why it is urgent
Surveillance footage	How long the substance was on the floor; whether employees walked past it; whether anyone inspected	Many systems overwrite on a short loop. Once the loop cycles, the single best piece of proof is gone permanently.
Sweep, inspection, and floor-care logs	Whether inspections actually happened, how often, and whether one was missed before your fall	Retained under internal policy only; not preserved for you unless demanded in writing.
The incident report	What the business recorded in its own words within minutes of the fall	Businesses often decline to give the customer a copy. It is obtained through the claim, not at the scene.
Prior incident and complaint records	That the condition occurred with regularity and was foreseeable	Reached through formal discovery, which requires a claim to be open.
Employee testimony	Actual knowledge, staffing levels, known problem areas	Retail and hospitality turnover is fast. Witnesses relocate and become unreachable.
Your photos and the substance itself	Character and age of the hazard; lighting; absence of warning signs	The floor is mopped within minutes. Your phone may be the only record that ever existed.

This is the practical reason a premises case is a race. A spoliation letter — a written demand that the property owner preserve video, logs, and records — has to reach the right party before the system overwrites itself. Waiting to “see how the injury heals” is the most common and most expensive mistake in these cases.

When § 768.0755 does not apply

This is widely misunderstood. Section 768.0755 is limited to transitory foreign substances in a business establishment. It is not the rule for every premises injury. A broken stair tread, a missing handrail, a collapsed railing, an unlit garage stairwell, a defective elevator, or a criminal attack in a parking lot is not a “transitory foreign substance” case. Those claims proceed under ordinary Florida negligence principles and the common-law duties a possessor of land owes, which the statute expressly leaves intact. The distinction matters because the defense will try to import the harder knowledge standard into a case where it does not belong.

Hurt on a Miami property? Call (786) 529-7411 or request a free case evaluation. No recovery, no fee.

Your Status on the Property Decides What Duty Was Owed to You

Before any question of knowledge, Florida asks a threshold question: why were you there? The duty a property owner owes changes with the visitor’s legal status. Almost every customer, tenant, hotel guest, and member of the public on business-open premises is an invitee — the category the law protects most.

Status	Who it covers	Duty generally owed
Invitee	Shoppers, restaurant and hotel patrons, tenants and their guests, delivery workers, anyone on premises open to the public for the owner’s business purpose	To use reasonable care to maintain the premises in a reasonably safe condition, and to warn of concealed dangers the owner knows of or should know of that the visitor is unlikely to discover
Licensee	Social guests and others present with permission but not for the owner’s business benefit	Generally, to refrain from wanton negligence or willful misconduct and to warn of known dangers not open to ordinary observation
Trespasser	A person on the property without permission; Florida distinguishes discovered from undiscovered trespassers under Fla. Stat. § 768.075	Sharply limited, and different for a discovered trespasser than an undiscovered one. Special rules can apply to children

Two invitee points carry real weight in Miami cases. First, the duty is not only to fix hazards but to inspect for them — an owner who never looks does not escape by claiming ignorance. Second, a warning is not always enough. Where a hazard is one the owner should anticipate a customer will encounter anyway, a cone in the wrong place does not automatically end the claim.

Miami Premises Liability Cases The Perazzo Law Firm Handles

Slip and fall on a wet or foreign substance

The core § 768.0755 case. Spills, leaking refrigeration, freshly mopped floors without warning, produce and ice on the floor, and rain tracked across polished tile at an entrance. In South Florida the entryway cases are seasonal and predictable, which is precisely why the “occurred with regularity” path matters here. See our Miami slip and fall lawyer page for a deeper look at this claim type, and our Hialeah slip and fall lawyer page if you fell in Hialeah.

Trip and fall on a structural or walkway defect

Raised or broken sidewalk slabs, uneven thresholds, loose floor tile, curled mats, unmarked single steps, potholes and wheel stops in parking lots, and exposed cabling. These are not transitory substances — they are conditions the property let develop, which changes the proof from “how long was it there” to “how long has it been like that.” Photographs showing weathering, wear, and prior patching often do the work.

Inadequate or negligent security

Assaults, robberies, and shootings in parking lots, garages, apartment complexes, hotels, bars, and nightclubs, where the property’s security was foreseeably inadequate. Florida law can impose a duty on a possessor of land to take reasonable measures to protect invitees from criminal acts by third parties when such acts are foreseeable — most commonly shown through the property’s own history of prior similar crime, along with broken gates, dead cameras, unlit lots, propped exterior doors, and absent or untrained security staff. This is a distinct body of law from slip and fall, and it is covered in detail further down this page.

Falling merchandise and objects

Product stacked above shoulder height, unsecured pallets, overloaded shelving, and items dislodged during restocking. Head, neck, and shoulder injuries from falling stock are frequently severe, and the liability question turns on stocking practices, shelf configuration, and whether staff were trained on safe display heights.

Stairway, step, and handrail defects

Inconsistent riser heights, worn nosing, missing or loose handrails, absent tread contrast, and stairwells without functioning lights. Building-code and Florida Building Code requirements are a central issue in these cases, because a code violation is powerful evidence of unreasonable conduct.

Elevator and escalator incidents

Misleveled elevator cars, sudden drops, doors that close on passengers, entrapments, and escalator falls or entanglements. Elevator safety in Florida is regulated under Chapter 399, Florida Statutes, and these cases usually involve more than one potentially responsible party — the building owner, the property manager, and the maintenance contractor under its service agreement. Inspection certificates and maintenance tickets are core evidence.

Swimming pool and pool deck incidents

Drownings and near-drownings, diving injuries, drain entrapment, chemical burns, and falls on pool decks. Residential pool barrier requirements appear in Chapter 515, Florida Statutes, and public pools carry separate regulatory duties. In a county with year-round swimming and thousands of condominium and rental pools, unlatched gates and broken self-closing hardware are recurring failures.

Dog bites and animal attacks on the property

Under Fla. Stat. § 767.04 a dog owner is generally liable for a bite inflicted on a person in a public place, or lawfully in a private place, regardless of the dog’s former viciousness. Where the attack happens in an apartment complex or common area, a separate premises claim against the property may exist alongside the owner’s liability. More detail is on our Miami dog bite lawyer page.

Construction site and elevated-fall hazards

Falls from scaffolding, ladders, and unguarded openings; falling tools and debris striking people below; and unsecured sites adjacent to public sidewalks. For an injured worker, Florida workers’ compensation is generally the exclusive remedy against the employer, but a claim may still exist against a property owner, general contractor, or another subcontractor whose negligence caused the injury. Sorting out who controlled the hazard is the whole case.

Inadequate lighting

Darkened garages, burned-out stairwell fixtures, unlit walkways, and parking lots left dark from dusk to dawn. Poor lighting is rarely a standalone claim — it is the condition that turns a minor defect into a fall and an ordinary parking lot into an opportunity for a crime. Lighting is also one of the few premises facts that can be measured and documented after the fact.

Negligent maintenance of common areas in condominiums and rentals

Miami-Dade is a county of associations and management companies. Lobbies, corridors, laundry rooms, garages, gyms, and walkways are typically the responsibility of the association or the property manager rather than the individual unit owner, and the correct defendant is often not obvious from the lease or the front-desk sign. Identifying the entity that actually controlled the area is a threshold task in these claims.

Negligent Security in Florida: Two Statutes Changed the Landscape

If you were attacked on a Miami property, two Florida statutes shape your claim in ways the older articles online do not reflect.

Fla. Stat. § 768.0706 — the multifamily residential safe harbor

An owner or principal operator of a multifamily residential property that substantially implements the security measures the statute specifies, and obtains a crime prevention through environmental design assessment, gains a presumption against liability in connection with criminal acts committed on the premises by third parties who are not employees or agents of the owner.

The measures the statute identifies include items such as a security camera system at points of entry and exit that retains recorded footage for a defined period, lighted parking lots and walkways and common areas from dusk until dawn, deadbolts on dwelling unit doors, locking devices on windows and sliding doors, peepholes or door viewers, locked gates with controlled access at pool fence areas, and crime deterrence and safety training for employees.

What this means for you as a claimant: a presumption is not immunity. It shifts the starting position, and it can be addressed with evidence. The practical fight becomes factual and documentary — was each measure actually implemented, or only written into a policy binder? Did the cameras record, or were they decorative? Was the assessment obtained, and was it followed? Was the gate broken for months? A safe harbor that exists only on paper is a very different case from one the property genuinely earned, and that difference is proven with maintenance records, work orders, vendor contracts, tenant complaints, and the property’s own footage.

Fla. Stat. § 768.0701 — the criminal’s fault goes on the verdict form

In a negligent security action against an owner, lessor, operator, or manager of commercial or real property, Florida law requires the trier of fact to consider the fault of all persons who contributed to the injury, including the person who committed the criminal act — whether or not that person is a party to the lawsuit. In plain terms, the attacker’s share of responsibility is apportioned even though the attacker will never pay. That reality makes the evidence of the property’s own failures — the specific, documented, repeated ones — the difference between a claim that stands and one that collapses.

Comparative Negligence: “You Should Have Watched Where You Were Walking”

This is the defense’s entire playbook in a premises case, and since 2023 it carries far more weight. Under Fla. Stat. § 768.81, Florida applies modified comparative negligence: your own share of fault reduces your recovery proportionally, and a claimant found to be more than 50 percent at fault for his or her own harm may not recover any damages at all. Before the 2023 change, a plaintiff who was 70 percent at fault still recovered 30 percent. Now that same claim is worth nothing.

Expect the insurer to build toward that 51 percent line from the first phone call. The recurring arguments:

The hazard was “open and obvious” and you simply did not look
You were on your phone, carrying items, or otherwise distracted
Your footwear was inappropriate for the surface
A warning cone was present somewhere in the vicinity
You entered an area that was roped off, closed, or marked for employees
A pre-existing condition, not the fall, explains your symptoms

None of these automatically defeats a claim. “Open and obvious” is a question of fact, not a magic phrase, and it does not erase an owner’s separate duty to maintain the premises in a reasonably safe condition. But it does explain why an unprepared recorded statement to the property’s adjuster is so damaging: those calls are structured to collect admissions that map directly onto the list above.

Deadlines: Two Years, and Much Shorter Against a Government Entity

Florida’s limitations period for negligence — which includes premises liability — is two years under Fla. Stat. § 95.11(5)(a), following the 2023 amendment that shortened it from four years. Claims that accrued before that change may be governed by the prior, longer period, which is a fact-specific question worth asking about rather than assuming.

Two years is the outer limit, not the working deadline. The evidence deadline is measured in days:

Surveillance footage is commonly overwritten on a short cycle
The hazard is cleaned up within minutes and never documented again
Witnesses who did not leave contact information become unfindable
Employees who saw what happened move on to other jobs

If you were hurt on government property

Injuries at a public building, a public school, a county park, a transit facility, or another government-controlled property in Miami-Dade fall under Fla. Stat. § 768.28, Florida’s limited waiver of sovereign immunity. That statute imposes requirements ordinary claims do not have: a written notice of claim must be presented to the appropriate agency (and in most cases to the Department of Financial Services) before suit, the agency is given a statutory period to investigate and respond, and statutory limits cap the damages recoverable absent legislative action. Because these notice and timing rules differ from the ordinary two-year period and are strictly enforced, a claim involving a public entity should be evaluated immediately rather than late. We describe these requirements in general terms here because they turn on which entity controlled the property — a question that is answered case by case.

What To Do in the First Days After a Fall or an Attack

Get medical care. Call 911 or get to the nearest emergency room if the injury is serious. Adrenaline masks head, neck, back, and internal injuries for hours or days, and a gap in treatment is the first thing the defense will point to.
Report it before you leave, and get it in writing. Ask for a manager, ask that an incident report be created, and ask for a copy. If they refuse a copy, note the manager’s name and the time you reported it.
Photograph the condition itself, immediately. The substance or defect, from multiple angles and distances. Wide shots that show where it sits in the space. It will be gone in minutes.
Photograph everything around it. Lighting, the absence or placement of warning signs, the flooring surface, the ceiling above for visible cameras, drains and coolers nearby, and any employee equipment in view.
Get witness names and phone numbers at the scene. Other customers will not be findable later, and an independent witness to how long the hazard sat there is often decisive.
Keep the footwear and clothing you were wearing. Do not clean them. Residue on a shoe is physical evidence of what was on the floor, and the shoes themselves answer the defense’s footwear argument.
Write down what happened the same day. Time, aisle or location, what you were doing, who you spoke to, what they said. Memory reshapes itself quickly.
Do not give a recorded statement to the property’s insurer before you have advice. That call is not neutral information gathering.
Do not post about it. Social media content is routinely collected and used to argue your injuries are exaggerated.
Get a preservation demand out fast. This is the step you cannot do alone and the one with the shortest fuse.

Injuries We See in Miami Premises Cases

Traumatic brain injury (TBI) and concussion — from striking the head on tile, concrete, or a fixture. Symptoms can be delayed and are often first noticed by family, not the injured person.
Hip and femur fractures — among the most consequential fall injuries, frequently requiring surgery and long rehabilitation.
Wrist, arm, and shoulder fractures — the instinctive bracing injury; rotator cuff tears are common in the same mechanism.
Herniated and bulging discs — spinal disc injury from the axial load of a hard landing, often producing radiating pain into an arm or leg.
Spinal cord injury — the catastrophic end of the range, with lasting effects on mobility and independence.
Soft-tissue injuries — sprains, strains, and torn ligaments, routinely minimized by insurers precisely because they do not appear on an X-ray.
Knee injuries — meniscus and ligament tears from twisting during a slip.
Facial and dental injuries — from a forward fall onto a hard surface, with lasting cosmetic and functional consequences.
Lacerations and scarring — from broken glass, metal edges, or fixtures.
Burns and chemical exposure — from pool chemicals, cleaning agents, or hot surfaces.
Crush and impact injuries — from falling merchandise or objects.
Psychological injury — anxiety, sleep disruption, and post-traumatic stress, particularly after an assault on a property where the person lives or works.

Delayed symptoms are the norm, not the exception. Waiting until pain becomes unbearable creates a treatment gap the defense will argue means you were not really hurt.

What a Miami Premises Liability Claim May Be Worth

No lawyer can tell you what a case is worth from a website, and any figure offered before the medical picture is complete is a guess. What can be described honestly are the categories of damages Florida law recognizes and the factors that influence value.

Economic damages — past and future medical treatment, surgery, therapy, assistive devices, lost wages, and diminished earning capacity.
Non-economic damages — pain and suffering, mental anguish, loss of the capacity to enjoy life, disfigurement, and in some cases a spouse’s loss of consortium.
Punitive damages — available only in narrow circumstances involving intentional misconduct or gross negligence, and governed by strict statutory prerequisites. They are the exception, not a planning assumption.
Wrongful death damages — where a premises hazard or a criminal act on a property causes death, brought under Florida’s Wrongful Death Act by the personal representative for the survivors and estate.

Factors that move value in either direction: the severity and permanence of the injury, whether surgery was required, the strength of the § 768.0755 knowledge evidence, your comparative-fault exposure under § 768.81, the available insurance coverage on the property, whether more than one responsible party exists, and the credibility of the medical record. Prior results do not guarantee or predict a similar outcome, and every case is different.

How a Premises Case Moves

Free case evaluation. We look at where it happened, who controlled the area, what you photographed, and what evidence is still recoverable.
Preservation and notice. Written demands to preserve video, sweep logs, incident reports, and maintenance records go out to the owner, manager, and insurer.
Identifying every responsible party. Owner, tenant, management company, association, janitorial or landscaping contractor, security vendor, maintenance contractor. Each may carry separate coverage.
Investigation. Scene documentation, witness statements, code and lighting analysis, and where warranted, retained experts on human factors, engineering, or security standards.
Medical development. Treatment proceeds and the record is built. Settling before the injury has declared itself is how claims get undervalued.
Demand and negotiation. A documented demand package goes to the carrier, and negotiation follows.
Suit if needed. If the offer does not reflect the case, suit is filed — in Miami-Dade cases, generally in the Eleventh Judicial Circuit — and discovery reaches the internal records a carrier will not hand over voluntarily.
Mediation, trial preparation, and resolution. Most cases resolve before trial. Preparing as though yours will not is what makes the resolution a real one.

Why Injured People in Miami Call The Perazzo Law Firm

No recovery, no fee. No upfront cost to start a premises claim.
Attorney Jonathan Perazzo handles the case personally — admitted to practice in Florida, Georgia, and Texas.
Bilingual staff — English and Español.
Free case evaluation, available 24/7. Premises evidence has a clock on it; so do we.
Preservation demands go out early, before footage and logs cycle out of existence.
Every responsible party identified — owner, manager, association, and contractors, not just the name on the door.
Cases prepared for trial, not merely positioned for a quick settlement.

Miami Premises Liability Questions We Are Asked Most

What do I have to prove to win a slip and fall case against a business in Florida?

If you slipped on a transitory foreign substance inside a business establishment, Fla. Stat. § 768.0755 requires you to prove the business had actual or constructive knowledge of the dangerous condition and should have taken action to remedy it. Constructive knowledge can be proven with circumstantial evidence that the condition existed for such a length of time that the business should have known about it, or that the condition occurred with regularity and was therefore foreseeable. Proving that you fell and were injured is not sufficient on its own. This is why surveillance footage, inspection logs, and prior incident records matter more than almost anything else in the case.

How long do I have to file a premises liability claim in Florida?

Florida’s limitations period for negligence claims, including premises liability, is generally two years under Fla. Stat. § 95.11(5)(a), following the 2023 amendment that shortened the prior four-year period. Claims that accrued before that change may be governed by the earlier period, which is a fact-specific question. Claims involving a government entity are subject to separate written notice requirements under Fla. Stat. § 768.28 and should be evaluated right away. In practice the evidence deadline arrives long before the legal one, because video and logs are not kept for two years.

Does the store’s surveillance video of my fall still exist?

Possibly, but not for long. Many commercial camera systems record over themselves on a short loop, and businesses are generally not required to keep footage indefinitely for someone who has not asked for it. A written preservation demand — sometimes called a spoliation letter — puts the property on notice that the footage is evidence and must be retained. The sooner that demand is delivered, the better the odds the video still exists. Once the loop has cycled, the best evidence in the case is unrecoverable.

The manager said the fall was my own fault. Does that end my claim?

No. What a manager or an adjuster says at the scene is an argument, not a legal ruling. Under Fla. Stat. § 768.81 Florida applies modified comparative negligence, so your own share of fault reduces your recovery proportionally, and a claimant found more than 50 percent at fault recovers nothing. That makes fault a contested issue to be developed with evidence rather than conceded on the spot. It is also the reason to be careful about recorded statements before you have advice.

Can I bring a claim against an apartment complex or hotel after I was attacked on the property?

Sometimes. Florida law can impose a duty on a property owner or operator to take reasonable measures to protect invitees from criminal acts by third parties when such acts are foreseeable, most often shown by the property’s history of prior similar crime together with failures like broken gates, non-functioning cameras, or unlit parking areas. Two statutes shape the analysis: Fla. Stat. § 768.0706 gives a presumption against liability to multifamily residential properties that substantially implement specified security measures and obtain a crime prevention assessment, and Fla. Stat. § 768.0701 requires the fault of the person who committed the criminal act to be considered even if that person is not a party. A presumption is not immunity, and whether the measures were genuinely implemented is a documentary question.

Do I have a case if there was no warning sign?

The absence of a warning sign is meaningful evidence, but it does not by itself establish liability in a transitory-substance case. You still have to connect the hazard to the business’s actual or constructive knowledge under § 768.0755 — a business cannot warn about a spill it had no reasonable way of knowing about. The flip side is also true: the presence of a cone does not automatically defeat a claim, particularly if it was placed poorly, placed late, or did not address the area where you actually fell. Photographs taken at the scene are what settle these arguments.

What if I was hurt on city, county, or school property in Miami-Dade?

Claims against a government entity in Florida proceed under Fla. Stat. § 768.28, the limited waiver of sovereign immunity, and they carry requirements ordinary claims do not. A written notice of claim generally must be presented to the appropriate agency before suit is filed, the agency is given a statutory period to investigate, and statutory limits cap recoverable damages absent legislative action. Because the rules are strictly enforced and depend on which entity actually controlled the property, these claims should be reviewed immediately rather than near the end of the limitations period.

What does it cost to hire a Miami premises liability lawyer?

The Perazzo Law Firm handles premises liability claims on a contingency basis — no recovery, no fee, and no upfront cost to begin. The case evaluation is free, and it is available in English and Spanish. Bring whatever you have: photographs, the name of the business or property, any incident report, and your medical records. If we are not the right fit for your situation, we will tell you that at the first conversation rather than after months have passed.

Serving Injured People Across Miami-Dade County

The Perazzo Law Firm’s Florida office is in North Miami Beach, and we represent people injured on property throughout Miami-Dade County — the City of Miami and Brickell, Downtown, Little Havana, Wynwood, Miami Beach, Coral Gables, Doral, Hialeah, Kendall, Miami Gardens, Aventura, North Miami, Homestead, and the surrounding communities. Premises cases here look the way the county looks: retail plazas and supermarkets, condominium towers and their garages, apartment complexes, hotels and short-term rentals, restaurants and nightlife venues, and construction sites in every direction. Miami-Dade civil cases are generally filed in the Eleventh Judicial Circuit. Consultations are available in English and Spanish.

Talk to a Miami Premises Liability Lawyer Today

The property owner’s insurer already knows what happened. They have the footage, the logs, and the incident report, and they have an adjuster assigned. Every week that passes is a week their evidence gets thinner and their story gets firmer. You do not need to have all the answers before you call — you need someone asking for that footage before it is gone.

Free case evaluation, available 24/7
No recovery, no fee — no upfront cost
Bilingual staff — English / Español
Handled personally by attorney Jonathan Perazzo

Call (786) 529-7411 or request your free case evaluation.

The Perazzo Law Firm
16666 NE 19th Ave #110
North Miami Beach, FL 33162
(786) 529-7411

Attorney advertising. This page is advertising material published by The Perazzo Law Firm, North Miami Beach, Florida. The information here is general legal information about Florida law, not legal advice, and does not create an attorney-client relationship. No result is promised or guaranteed; every premises liability case is different and outcomes depend on the specific facts, evidence, property, and insurance coverage involved. Prior results do not guarantee or predict a similar outcome, and results vary. Statutory citations are provided at the section or chapter level for reference and may be amended; consult an attorney about your specific situation. Attorney Jonathan Perazzo is admitted to practice law in Florida, Georgia, and Texas.